Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40566770›Full record

ArticleSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2025

[A study on electroencephalogram characteristics of depression in patients with aphasia based on resting state and emotional Stroop task].

Siyuan Ding, Yan Zhu, Chang Shi, Banghua Yang

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Classification of systemic lupus erythematosus resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data based on the end-to-end model].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Siyuan DingMedical School, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, P. R. China.
Yan ZhuNeurorehabilitation Department, The Second Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200431, P. R. China.
Chang ShiNeurorehabilitation Department, The Second Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200431, P. R. China.
Banghua YangMedical School, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-stroke aphasia is associated with a significantly elevated risk of depression, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study recorded 64-channel electroencephalogram data and depression scale scores from 12 aphasic patients with depression, 8 aphasic patients without depression, and 12 healthy controls during resting state and an emotional Stroop task. Spectral and microstate analyses were conducted to examine brain activity patterns across conditions. Results showed that depression scores significantly negatively explained the occurrence of microstate class C and positively explained the transition probability from microstate class A to B. Furthermore, aphasic patients with depression exhibited increased alpha-band activation in the frontal region. These findings suggest distinct neural features in aphasic patients with depression and offer new insights into the mechanisms contributing to their heightened vulnerability to depression.

Indexed as

AphasiaDepressionElectroencephalographyEmotionsStroop TestAdultAgedBrainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRestStrokeAphasiaDepressionElectroencephalogramMicrostate

Identifiers

PMID40566770
PMCPMC12236200

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.