ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
Demonstrating the reproductive consequences of cognition: learning from experience.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroactive Pollution Disrupts Cognition in Fish by Causing Sex-Specific Effects on Spatial Learning.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Selection shapes diverse animal minds.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- The role of personal reproductive experience on nest building in a wild bird.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reproductive success and its consequences for fitness are key to determining how natural selection shapes cognitive abilities, and thus how and why cognition might change over evolutionary time. However, demonstrating reproductive costs or benefits owing to variation in cognitive ability is hugely challenging, in part because traits such as body size and condition make the largest contribution to reproductive success. Our ability to discriminate a role for 'being smart' in fitness is then already limited. Additionally, most animals have many ways to solve problems, only some of which will depend on their cognitive abilities. However, specific instances in key parts of animal's life may depend heavily on their cognitive abilities, and without them the animal will not survive or reproduce. Retrieving food stores is one example and nest building might be another. For food-storing, spatial ability is key, while for nest building the pertinent ability is learning what works. The importance of animals learning from previous experience may be very common but is rarely considered explicitly in cognitive terms. Work on fitness consequences of cognition should develop from the presentation of discrete tasks testing specific abilities to encompass how learning from experience influences behavioural evolution more broadly.This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Selection shapes diverse animal minds'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.