Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567069›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2025

Diagnostic and prognostic multimodal prediction models in Alzheimer's disease: A scoping review.

Xin Xia, Lukas A Duffner, Christophe Bintener, Angela Bradshaw, Daphné Lamirel, Linus Jönsson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xin XiaDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Section for Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8101-0563
Lukas A DuffnerAlzheimer Europe, Senningerberg, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-8824-8531
Christophe BintenerAlzheimer Europe, Senningerberg, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0003-0195-5143
Angela BradshawAlzheimer Europe, Senningerberg, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-3711-6547
Daphné LamirelAlzheimer Europe, Senningerberg, Luxembourg.
Linus JönssonDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Section for Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5751-6292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundMultimodal prediction models for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are emerging as promising tools for improving detection and informing prognosis.ObjectiveTo summarize the predictive objectives, constituting predictors and algorithms, and performance of existing multimodal prediction models.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science up to January 15, 2024, to identify prediction models covering the full spectrum of AD, from the preclinical stage to subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD dementia. The predictors, algorithms, and model performance of prediction models were summarized narratively by their predictive objectives. The review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (osf.io/zkw6g).ResultsPredicting the future progression from MCI to AD dementia was the most common objective of prediction models for AD. The second most common objective was to classify AD stages (SCD versus MCI versus AD dementia), followed by detecting the presence of amyloid, tau, or neurodegeneration. More than half of the prediction models reported an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve exceeding 0.8 and an accuracy exceeding 70%. However, 66.7% of the prediction models were developed using data from the ADNI study, and only 10.1% of the models went through external validation.ConclusionsExisting multimodal prediction models have mainly focused on the prediction of current or future AD stages and reported good performance. However, these models need to be validated using data other than the data used for model training before being considered for practical applications.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAlgorithmsDisease ProgressionHumansPrognosisAlzheimer's diseasedisease progressionearly diagnosismultimodalprediction modelscoping review

Identifiers

PMID40567069
PMCPMC12583647

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.