ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Finite element analysis-assisted surgical planning and evaluation of flap design in hand surgery.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3d elastic-modulus imaging using ultrasound linear arrays and efficient data-driven training strategies.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
- TowardFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Mechanomedicine in digestive surgery: a theranostic framework integrating mechanical diagnostics and therapeutic modulation across the perioperative continuum.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Finite Element Analysis of Von Mises Stress in External Fixators for Open Tibial Fractures: A Comparative Study of ASTM F1541-02 and Tibia-Based Models in Indonesian Patients.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the anatomical variability among patients and the intricate geometry of the hand, the shape and size of the skin flap have traditionally relied heavily on the surgeon's experience and subjective judgment. This dependence can lead to inconsistent and sometimes suboptimal results, particularly in complex cases such as web reconstruction in syndactyly surgery. Finite element analysis (FEA) provides a quantitative method to simulate and optimize skin flap design during surgery. However, existing FEA studies in this field are scattered across a wide range of seemingly unrelated topics. To address this, we present a comprehensive review focused on the application of FEA in skin flap design since 2000, with attention to all aspects of preprocessing and postprocessing. The primary objective is to evaluate the potential of FEA to generate patient-specific models by integrating individualized anatomical and biomechanical data while identifying key advancements, analyzing methodological challenges, exploring emerging technologies, and outlining future research directions. A critical finding is that the mechanical modeling of skin remains a major limitation in current FEA applications. To address this, future studies should focus on the development and refinement of non-invasive techniques for acquiring patient-specific skin properties. We also recommend several additional research directions based on our findings. These include exploring techniques to unfold 3D wound surfaces into 2D representations, which can improve mesh quality and computational efficiency; validating FEA simulations through large-scale, multicenter clinical studies to ensure robustness and generalizability; developing real-time AR/MR systems that integrate simulation or optimization results into surgical workflows; and creating AI-powered platforms that learn from clinical data to provide adaptive and personalized flap design recommendations. These findings offer a pathway to bridge the gap between simulation and clinical practice, ultimately aiming to improve surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.