ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025
Abiotic stress responses in forage crops and grasses: the role of secondary metabolites and biotechnological interventions.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physiological indicators associated with drought tolerance and post-drought recovery in tall fescue.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Plant Immunometabolism: Metabolic Reprogramming Linking Developmental Signaling and Defense Metabolites.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Construction of a flavonoid transcriptional-metabolic network and analysis of auxin signaling activation in Leymus chinensis in response to animal feeding.Plant cell reports · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Analysis of the DUF1664 Family Genes in Peanut (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Adaptive Strategies to Biotic Stress in Qatar's Native Flora.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forage crops and grasses play crucial roles in global agriculture, serving as primary sources of livestock feed. However, various abiotic stresses, such as drought, salinity, extreme temperatures, and heavy metals, frequently challenge their productivity, quality, and resilience. In response to these stressors, plants activate defense mechanisms, including the production of secondary metabolites (SMs). This review exclusively examines the diverse impacts of abiotic stresses on forage crops and grasses' physiological processes, growth, development, yield, and quality. We delve into the synthesis, types, and role of SMs in mediating stress responses, conferring adaptation and resilience to adverse environmental conditions in forage crops and grasses. Furthermore, we examine the regulatory mechanisms governing SM production in response to abiotic stress. This is crucial for developing strategies to enhance stress tolerance and improve forage productivity and quality. Finally, the review discusses emerging biotechnological interventions for improving forage crop performance under abiotic stress. Different omics technologies, gene editing, and pathway engineering offer promising avenues that enable the precise manipulation of key regulatory genes and metabolic pathways, with enhanced SM biosynthesis to engineer resilient crops tailored to specific environmental challenges. This review obtains a strong correlation of SMs with improving fodder and forage crop tolerance to varying degrees of stresses by regulating antioxidant activity, osmotic homeostasis, and membrane stability, ultimately enhancing plant viability, productivity, and quality under diverse stress conditions. Further, unraveling the intricate interplay between abiotic stresses, SMs, and biotechnological interventions is pivotal for advancing forage crop resilience and ensuring global food security amid changing environmental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.