ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
HFSA: hybrid feature selection approach to improve medical diagnostic system.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- RISE: a novel unified framework for feature relevance in malnutrition analytics integrating statistical and expert insights.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thanks to the presence of artificial intelligence methods, the diagnosis of patients can be done quickly and accurately. This article introduces a new diagnostic system (DS) that includes three main layers called the rejection layer (RL), selection layer (SL), and diagnostic layer (DL) to accurately diagnose cases suffering from various diseases. In RL, outliers can be removed using the genetic algorithm (GA). At the same time, the best features can be selected by using a new feature selection method called the hybrid feature selection approach (HFSA) in SL. In the next step, the filtered data is passed to the naive Bayes (NB) classifier in DL to give accurate diagnoses. In this work, the main contribution is represented in introducing HFSA as a new selection approach that is composed of two main stages; fast stage (FS) and accurate stage (AS). In FS, chi-square, as a filtering methodology, is applied to quickly select the best features while Hybrid Optimization Algorithm (HOA), as a wrapper methodology, is applied in AS to accurately select features. It is concluded that HFSA is better than other selection methods based on experimental results because HFSA can enable three different classifiers called NB, K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and artificial neural network (ANN) to provide the maximum accuracy, precision, and recall values and the minimum error value. Additionally, experimental results proved that DS, including GA as an outlier rejection method, HFSA as feature selection, and NB as diagnostic mode, outperformed other diagnosis models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.