Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567661›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Anticancer drug synergy prediction based on CatBoost.

Changheng Li, Nana Guan, Hongyi Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Changheng LiCollege of Big Data Statistics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China.
Nana GuanCollege of Big Data Statistics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China.
Hongyi ZhangCollege of Big Data Statistics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The research of cancer treatments has always been a hot topic in the medical field. Multi-targeted combination drugs have been considered as an ideal option for cancer treatment. Since it is not feasible to use clinical experience or high-throughput screening to identify the complete combinatorial space, methods such as machine learning models offer the possibility to explore the combinatorial space effectively. Methods: In this work, we proposed a machine learning method based on CatBoost to predict the synergy scores of anticancer drug combinations on cancer cell lines, which utilized oblivious trees and ordered boosting technique to avoid overfitting and bias. The model was trained and tested using the data screened from NCI-ALMANAC dataset. The drugs were characterized with morgan fingerprints, drug target information, monotherapy information, and the cell lines were described with gene expression profiles. Results: In the stratified 5-fold cross-validation, our method obtained excellent results, where, the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) is 0.9217, precision-recall area under the curve (PR AUC) is 0.4651, mean squared error (MSE) is 0.1365, and Pearson correlation coefficient is 0.5335. The performance is significantly better than three other advanced models. Additionally, when using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to interpret the biological significance of the prediction results, we found that drug features played more prominent roles than cell line features, and genes associated with cancer development, such as PTK2, CCND1, and GNA11, played an important part in drug synergy prediction. Combining the experimental results, the model proposed in this study has a good prediction effect and can be used as an alternative method for predicting anticancer drug combinations.

Indexed as

Anticancer drugCatBoostDrug synergyPrediction

Identifiers

PMID40567661
PMCPMC12190655

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.