Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567717›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Enhancing skin lesion classification: a CNN approach with human baseline comparison.

Deep Ajabani, Zaffar Ahmed Shaikh, Amr Yousef, Karar Ali, Marwan A Albahar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deep Ajabani *Source InfoTech Inc., Loganville, Georgia, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-9834-6953
Zaffar Ahmed Shaikh *Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Benazir Bhutto Shaheed University Lyari, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-0323-2061
Amr YousefElectrical Engineering Department, University of Business and Technology, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Karar AliVentureDive Pvt. Limited, Karachi, Pakistan.
Marwan A AlbaharCollege of Engineering and Computing in Al-Lith, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3586-3423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents an augmented hybrid approach for improving the diagnosis of malignant skin lesions by combining convolutional neural network (CNN) predictions with selective human interventions based on prediction confidence. The algorithm retains high-confidence CNN predictions while replacing low-confidence outputs with expert human assessments to enhance diagnostic accuracy. A CNN model utilizing the EfficientNetB3 backbone is trained on datasets from the ISIC-2019 and ISIC-2020 SIIM-ISIC melanoma classification challenges and evaluated on a 150-image test set. The model's predictions are compared against assessments from 69 experienced medical professionals. Performance is assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under curve (AUC) metrics, alongside an analysis of human resource costs. The baseline CNN achieves an AUC of 0.822, slightly below the performance of human experts. However, the augmented hybrid approach improves the true positive rate to 0.782 and reduces the false positive rate to 0.182, delivering better diagnostic performance with minimal human involvement. This approach offers a scalable, resource-efficient solution to address variability in medical image analysis, effectively harnessing the complementary strengths of expert humans and CNNs.

Indexed as

CNNConvolutional neural networksDeep learningEfficientNetEfficientNetB3International skin imaging collaborationInternational skin imaging collaboration (ISIC)Machine learningMedical imagingSkin cancer diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID40567717
PMCPMC12192895

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.