ArticleSAGE open medicine2025
Analysis of adverse events with ruxolitinib using real-world datasets and drug-interaction networks.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Ruxolitinib is used to treat myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. This study aimed to determine the association between ruxolitinib and adverse events by evaluating case reports published between January 2014 and March 2024 in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database. Methods: The signals for the ruxolitinib-adverse event association were identified using propensity score-adjusted reporting odds ratio analysis. Data obtained from the drug-gene interaction, drug signature, search tool for chemical interactions, and interaction reference index databases were used to construct a drug-gene interaction network. Functional and pathway enrichment analyses were performed using the Disease Ontology Semantic and Enrichment and ReactomePA R packages. Results: The propensity score-adjusted reporting odds ratio for ruxolitinib-associated adverse events was as follows: anemia, 18.49 (95% confidence interval (CI): 16.15-21.16); myelosuppression, 4.70 (95% CI: 3.54-6.24); pancytopenia, 1.97 (95% CI: 1.23-3.16); cardiac failure, 2.29 (95% CI: 1.60-3.28); hepatic function abnormal, 1.60 (95% CI: 1.15-2.23); herpes zoster, 6.40 (95% CI: 4.35-9.41); pneumonia, 2.96 (95% CI: 2.35-3.73); renal impairment, 1.34 (95% CI: 0.94-1.90); sepsis, 5.14 (95% CI: 3.75-7.05); interstitial lung disease, 0.33 (95% CI: 0.21-0.52); deep vein thrombosis, 0.32 (95% CI: 0.07-1.44); hemorrhage, 1.99 (95% CI: 1.05-3.75). We also assessed 3015 human genes that directly or indirectly interact with ruxolitinib. The molecular complex detection plug-in of Cytoscape was used to detect 24 clusters. Several genes were enriched in the biological processes of "anemia" and "bacterial infections," identified as significant ruxolitinib-related disease terms. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database indicated potential associations between ruxolitinib and adverse events, including anemia and bacterial infections. Future research should explore the underlying pharmacological mechanisms using functional enrichment analysis of ruxolitinib-associated genes related to blood toxicity and bacterial infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.