Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568188›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

Integrating artificial intelligence with circulating tumor DNA for non-small cell lung cancer: opportunities, challenges, and future directions.

Nishanth Thalambedu, Mamtha Balla, Barath Prashanth Sivasubramanian, Prasanth Sadaram, Krishna Prathiba Malla, Krishna P Vasipalli, Sunil Kakadia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nishanth ThalambeduDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Mamtha BallaMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Barath Prashanth SivasubramanianNortheast Georgia Medical Center, Ganiesville, GA, United States.
Prasanth SadaramDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Krishna Prathiba MallaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, India.
Krishna P VasipalliIndira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, India.
Sunil KakadiaGenesis Cancer and Blood Institute, Little Rock, AR, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer mortality, with late-stage diagnosis contributing to poor survival. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a non-invasive biomarker for screening, diagnosis, and monitoring, with limitations about sensitivity and specificity challenges. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising avenue to enhance ctDNA applications in NSCLC by improving mutation detection rates and sensitivities, refining minimal residual disease (MRD) predictions, enabling earlier detection of relapse, sometimes earlier than imaging, differentiating tumor vs. non-tumor derived signals to improve specificities. AI achieves 0.002% mutant allelic fraction detection, 94% relapse detection sensitivity, and 5.2-month lead time over imaging. This narrative review explores the role of ctDNA in NSCLC management, highlighting how AI amplifies its utility across screening, diagnosis, treatment evaluation, MRD detection, and disease surveillance while outlining key opportunities, challenges, and future directions.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecirculating tumor DNAlung cancerminimal residual diseasescreening

Identifiers

PMID40568188
PMCPMC12187728

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.