Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568385›Full record

ArticleJournal of market access & health policy2025

Health and Social Care Integration: Insights from International Implementation Cases.

Ricardo Correia de Matos, Generosa do Nascimento, Adalberto Campos Fernandes, Cristiano Matos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of market access & health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ricardo Correia de MatosDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Unidade Local de Saúde da Região de Aveiro (ULSRA), EPE, 3810-164 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8186-2697
Generosa do NascimentoDepartment of Human Resources and Organizational Behavior (IBS), ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal; generosa.nascimento@iscte-iul.pt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2902-7210
Adalberto Campos FernandesNational School of Public Health (ENSP), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 1600-560 Lisboa, Portugal; adalberto.fernandes@ensp.unl.pt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3784-8198
Cristiano MatosAtlântica School of Health, Atlantic University, 2730-036 Barcarena, Portugal; cristianom@uatla.pt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of health and social care is increasingly recognized as essential to address population ageing, the rise in chronic diseases, and persistent health inequities. Across Europe, diverse models have been developed to improve service coordination, resource efficiency, and person-centered care. This paper aims to explore international experiences in integrating health and social care, identify common strategies and challenges, and provide insights to inform policy development in countries where integration remains incipient, with a focus on Portugal. A qualitative comparative approach was employed. A systematic literature review was conducted across PUBMED, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar, including peer-reviewed articles, policy reports, and government documents. Thematic analysis was used to identify integration models, enablers, and barriers across different countries. Different models reveal that joint governance, pooled funding, strong community involvement, and digital innovation are key enablers of integration. However, common challenges persist, including fragmented governance, inconsistent implementation, and financial sustainability. In Portugal, structural separation between the health and social sectors continues to limit strategic alignment. Successful integration depends on political commitment, shared vision, and active stakeholder collaboration. European models offer adaptable lessons for Portugal and similar systems, especially regarding intersectoral coordination and preventive care. Integrating health and social care is vital for building resilient, equitable systems. Portugal must adopt a cohesive national strategy; strengthen local implementation; and embrace person-centered, sustainable solutions to ensure long-term impact. Integrating the health and social sectors is indispensable in navigating the ever-evolving healthcare landscape and promoting holistic well-being.

Indexed as

health policyintegrated healthcare systemsintersectoral collaborationpatient-centered caresocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID40568385
PMCPMC12194770

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.