Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40569635›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuropsychology2026

Adult lifespan normative data (18-92 years) for executive function tests; the Stroop colour word test, COWAT and Hayling sentence completion test.

Patrick Murphy, Emily Webster, Lisa Cipolotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuropsychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patrick MurphyDepartment of Neuropsychology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8574-1470
Emily WebsterDepartment of Neuropsychology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Lisa CipolottiDepartment of Neuropsychology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neuropsychological assessment of executive functions is an important part of the diagnostic process for many neurological diseases and for predicting the ability of neurological patients to function independently. Unfortunately, for the majority of commonly used executive function tests there is a paucity of updated normative data, particularly for older adults. This complicates the process of a clinically meaningful assessment. To help address this, we provide normative data for three well-validated tests of executive functions, the Stroop Colour/Word Test, the Controlled Oral Word Association Test and the Hayling Sentence Completion Test, alongside scores from an estimate of general intellectual ability. These tests are sensitive to frontal lobe damage and provide clinicians with information about possible focal damage to the left and right frontal lobes. Percentiles are presented for five age cohorts across the adult lifespan (18-92 years). A regression equation with age and predicted full-scale IQ also allows for the categorisation of normal and defective performance on the Stroop and Hayling tests. Given the increasing proportion of older adults requiring neuropsychological assessment, we investigated separately two groups in the older adult range: 65-79 years and 80-92 years. We found a decline in performance for older adults on all three tests. This decline was more marked amongst lower scoring older adults. We did not find a significant relationship between sex and performance on any of the three tests. The findings are discussed in the light of the cognitive reserve theory of ageing.

Indexed as

AgingExecutive FunctionNeuropsychological TestsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesStroop TestYoung AdultCOWATexecutive functionsHaylingnormative dataolder adultsStroop

Identifiers

PMID40569635
PMCPMC12976820

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.