ArticlePloS one2025
How to nudge students toward healthier snacks? Consumer neuroscience insights on multisensory nudge interventions in university vending machines.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nudge has proven effective in promoting healthier eating, especially in academic environments. However, its application in vending machines has not been extensively studied yet, with existing studies focusing on choice and overlooking the emotional and cognitive responses to these interventions. Our research explored how visual and olfactory nudges (and a combination of both) can encourage healthier choices in university vending machines, and examined the related emotional and cognitive reactions, adopting a consumer neuroscience approach. It encompassed three distinct analysis levels: behavioral (snack choice), neurophysiological (emotional and cognitive reactions assessed through skin conductance and electroencephalography), and attentional (visual attention on snacks evaluated via eye-tracking). The findings revealed that while visual and olfactory nudges, when considered individually, were associated with an increased likelihood of making healthier choices, their combined effect was not significant. Skin conductance indicated that olfactory and combined nudge interventions induced relaxation, potentially promoting healthier choices. Electroencephalography results suggested a reduced motivational approach toward snacks when both nudges were combined. Eye-tracking indicated that individuals pay heightened attention to healthy snacks when positioned at eye level, however, this can also be affected by the nudge condition. Our findings suggest that implementing visual or olfactory nudges alone may promote healthier choices in vending machines, whereas combining them may lessen their impact, and corroborate the importance of positioning target products in locations where they are readily visible to consumers. These insights enhance our understanding of the emotional, cognitive, and attentional components behind nudge interventions and offer practical strategies for promoting healthier eating habits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.