Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40571423›Full record

SynthesisOrthopaedic surgery2025

The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Residual Back Pain After Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Wenlong Li, Bing Zhang, Chencheng Mei, Hui Li, Ruizheng Zhu, Hao Lin, Jianmin Wen, Yang Wu, Xianzhi Ma

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wenlong LiBeijing Hepingli Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6156-3390
Bing ZhangBeijing Hepingli Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chencheng MeiBeijing Huaxin Hospital (The First Hospital of Tsinghua University), Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hui LiBeijing Hepingli Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Ruizheng ZhuThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hao LinBeijing Hepingli Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jianmin WenWangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yang WuBeijing Hepingli Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xianzhi MaBeijing Hepingli Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research of China 2024-4-7015Dongcheng District Health Science and Technology Project of Beijing [2023]-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are prevalent among the elderly. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVA) is a commonly adopted minimally invasive treatment, yet many patients endure residual back pain (RBP) posttreatment, affecting their recovery and quality of life. Given the inconsistent prevalence of RBP across studies and the multitude of influencing factors, a systematic review and meta-analysis is necessary to determine its prevalence and identify risk factors.

methodsEnglish (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Ovid, Cochrane Library) and Chinese (CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM) literature databases were systematically searched until December 31, 2023. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool prevalence rates from individual studies. The associations between the identified risk factors and RBP were also analyzed. Sensitivity and subgroup analyzes were performed to identify the source of heterogeneity and to compare the prevalence estimates across the groups. The Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBIs) quality assessment checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The I

resultsA total of 5146 articles were collected. Finally, 26 articles involving 9703 participants were included. Among them, 1245 experienced RBP. The prevalence of RBP in individual studies ranged from 4.56% to 50.00%, with a median of 14.90%. The pooled prevalence was 16.3% (95% CI: 13.5%-19.1%). The prevalence was higher among females [16.1% (95% CI: 13.1%-19.1%)] than males [15.9% (95% CI: 12.5%-19.2%)]. Subgroup analysis based on evaluation time showed that the prevalence was higher at 3 months or more after surgery [total: 17.3% (95% CI: 13.2%-21.4%) vs. 15.7% (95% CI: 12.1%-19.2%), males: 16.5% (95% CI: 12.3%-20.6%) vs. 15.3% (95% CI: 11.0%-19.6%), females: 16.9% (95% CI: 12.6%-21.1%) vs. 15.5% (95% CI: 11.6%-19.5%)]. Regarding the risk factors, several factors demonstrated significant associations with RBP. Patients with low pre-bone mineral density were more likely to experience RBP compared to those with higher density. Moreover, thoracolumbar fascia injury, unsatisfactory cement distribution, multiple vertebral fractures, and postoperative vertebral body height recovery rate were also identified as risk factors increasing the likelihood of RBP.

conclusionRBP is common after PVA, indicating the imperative of intervention strategies to alleviate the suffering and reduce negative ramifications. Moreover, various risk factors should be comprehensively considered to accurately assess patients' conditions and formulate targeted treatment and rehabilitation plans to alleviate patients' RBP symptoms.

Indexed as

Back PainFractures, CompressionOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesVertebroplastyHumansPrevalenceRisk Factorsmeta‐analysisosteoporotic vertebral compression fracturespercutaneous vertebroplastyresidual back painsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40571423
PMCPMC12318695

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.