Trial reportNeuropsychological rehabilitation2026
Measurement of cross-language and cross-domain generalization following semantic feature-based anomia treatment in bilingual aphasia.
Trial report in Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting bilingual aphasia treatment outcomes using digital twins: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Navigating the Complexity of Bilingual Aphasia: Current Insights and Future Directions.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Semantic feature-based treatment (SFT), which engages the semantic network by repeatedly targeting retrieval of conceptual features to improve lexical-semantic access, has shown promise for facilitating generalization in aphasia rehabilitation. However, its capacity to drive broad improvement across cognitive-linguistic domains in bilinguals with aphasia (BWA) remains unclear. This study examined generalization effects (i.e., direct transfer, near transfer, and far transfer) following SFT in 48 Spanish-English BWA who took part in a randomized controlled trial. Participants received 40 h of SFT targeting word retrieval, with generalization assessed across three domains: naming of untrained items (direct transfer), semantic processing (near transfer), as well as global language ability and nonverbal abstract reasoning (far transfer). Results showed (i) robust improvements for trained and untrained naming targets, demonstrating direct transfer, (ii) near transfer effects for select semantic processing tasks, and (iii) far transfer limited to overall language function, with no gains in domain-general cognition. Notably, treatment benefits extended across languages, demonstrating cross-language generalization to multiple domains of language processing. Findings highlight SFT's capacity to drive comprehensive language recovery in BWA, revealing broad generalization effects across languages and linguistic domains. Such effects underscore the importance of systematically examining generalization patterns to optimize rehabilitation outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.