ArticleCancer medicine2025
Personalised Medicine in Cervical Cancer: Evaluating Therapy Resistance Through Multi-Model Approaches.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalised Medicine in Cervical Cancer: Evaluating Therapy Resistance Through Multi-Model Approaches.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Cervical Cancer: Clinical Utility and Medico-Legal Perspectives.Oncology research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCervical cancer remains a leading cause of malignancy among women globally, disproportionately affecting women from low-to-middle-income countries, including South Africa. The high prevalence in impoverished communities places significant pressure on the public healthcare system. In these regions, human papillomavirus (HPV); the primary risk factor for cervical cancer-along with co-occurring immunosuppressive conditions such as HIV, is common. Compounding this burden is the widespread development of treatment resistance to conventional therapies like cisplatin and carboplatin. Resistance is frequently associated with therapy-induced cellular senescence, underscoring the need for more personalised treatment strategies tailored to individual patient profiles. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study aimed to assess ex vivo methods' utility in predicting patient-specific therapy responses. Biopsy samples from cervical cancer patients were cultured and subjected to various chemotherapies. Cell viability, senescence markers and treatment resistance pathways were analysed to determine optimal treatment outcomes.
resultsThe findings revealed significant variability in optimal treatment responses, with ex vivo methods demonstrating limitations in fully capturing the complexity of patient-specific reactions to therapy. No single experimental model provided comprehensive predictive insights into treatment outcomes.
conclusionThis study underscores the need for integrative and multidisciplinary approaches when evaluating treatment strategies for cervical cancer. While ex vivo models offer valuable insights, combining multiple experimental methods is crucial for a more reliable and comprehensive understanding of treatment response and resistance mechanisms. Standardiszing approaches or employing method combinations may enhance personalised medicine efforts, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.