Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40572202›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2025

Effects of Pineapple Peel on the Nutritional and Microbial Profiles of Napier Grass-Sugarcane Top Silage.

Huade Xie, Zhenhua Tang, Fanquan Zeng, Xianqing Luo, Fang Xie, Li Liang, Jingzhen Li, Pinfeng Liao, Lijuan Peng, Zhipei Li and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Huade XieGuangxi Key Laboratory of Buffalo Genetics, Reproduction and Breeding, Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Nanning 530001, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2904-3752
Zhenhua TangGuangxi Key Laboratory of Buffalo Genetics, Reproduction and Breeding, Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Nanning 530001, China.
Fanquan ZengGuangxi Key Laboratory of Buffalo Genetics, Reproduction and Breeding, Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Nanning 530001, China.
Xianqing LuoGuangxi Key Laboratory of Buffalo Genetics, Reproduction and Breeding, Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Nanning 530001, China.
Fang XieGuangxi Key Laboratory of Buffalo Genetics, Reproduction and Breeding, Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Nanning 530001, China.
Li LiangGuangxi Key Laboratory of Buffalo Genetics, Reproduction and Breeding, Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Nanning 530001, China.
Jingzhen LiGuangxi Key Laboratory of Buffalo Genetics, Reproduction and Breeding, Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Nanning 530001, China.
Pinfeng LiaoGuangxi Key Laboratory of Buffalo Genetics, Reproduction and Breeding, Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Nanning 530001, China.
Lijuan PengGuangxi Key Laboratory of Buffalo Genetics, Reproduction and Breeding, Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Nanning 530001, China.
Zhipei LiGuangxi Key Laboratory of Buffalo Genetics, Reproduction and Breeding, Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Nanning 530001, China.
Haiyu BaiGuangxi Key Laboratory of Buffalo Genetics, Reproduction and Breeding, Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Nanning 530001, China.
Xiaoqiang GuoGuangxi Key Laboratory of Buffalo Genetics, Reproduction and Breeding, Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Nanning 530001, China.
Chengjian YangGuangxi Key Laboratory of Buffalo Genetics, Reproduction and Breeding, Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Nanning 530001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3000-1253

Funding

the Guangxi Dairy Buffalo Innovation Team of National Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System nycytxgxcxtd-2021-21-03the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation 2025GXNSFAA069166the Guangxi Science and Technology Major Project Guike AA22068099-11the National Key R&D Program of China No.2024YFD1301304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural byproducts, including pineapple peel (PP), are valuable feed additives which support the livestock industry. However, conflicting evidence exists regarding the optimal amount of PP required to achieve optimal fermentation in silage. This study examines the impact of ensiling mixtures of equal proportions of fresh Napier grass (NG) and sugarcane top (ST) with varying levels of PP (0% [C], 10% [P1], 20% [P2], and 30% [P3]) on fermentation quality, microbiological profiles, and in vitro ruminal digestion. Compared to the C silage, the dry matter, crude protein, and neutral detergent fiber contents decreased in the silage treated with increasing PP (

Indexed as

in vitro ruminal digestionmixed silageNapier grasspineapple peelsugarcane top

Identifiers

PMID40572202
PMCPMC12194918

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.