Evidence mapPaperPMID 40572985Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Graphene Oxide: Preparation and Medical Research.

Xulong Huang, Wengang Zhao, Farid Khalilov, Nuo Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xulong HuangCollege of Life and Environmental Science, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China.ORCID 0009-0006-0216-1387
Wengang ZhaoCollege of Life and Environmental Science, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China.ORCID 0009-0003-7058-6545
Farid KhalilovCollege of Life and Environmental Science, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7281-3607
Nuo XuCollege of Life and Environmental Science, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China.

Funding

Grant Biological Breeding-Major Projects 2023ZD04062Ouhai District Key Scientific Research Projects 2024oh0002Scientific and Technological Plan Project of Wenzhou 2023Y1819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxide (GO) has emerged as a highly versatile nanomaterial due to its exceptional physicochemical properties, including large surface area, and strong drug-loading capacity. These characteristics have enabled its broad application in fields such as wound healing, targeted drug delivery, and antimicrobial therapies. However, despite its promise, concerns surrounding GO's cytotoxicity, biocompatibility, and potential pathological effects have limited its clinical translation. Addressing these limitations requires a deeper understanding of GO's interactions with biological systems and the development of strategies to mitigate its adverse effects. Recent advances in surface functionalization, covalent crosslinking, and the incorporation of GO into biocompatible matrices have shown great potential in enhancing its performance while minimizing toxicity. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the antibacterial mechanisms of GO and highlights recent progress in chemical modification approaches that improve its efficacy in biomedical applications, particularly in wound healing and drug delivery. By critically examining both the advantages and limitations of GO, this work aims to inform future research directions and support the safe and effective integration of GO-based materials in advanced therapeutic systems.

Indexed as

antibacterialcarbondamagefunctionalizationGOgraphenegraphene oxidewound healing

Identifiers

PMID40572985
PMCPMC12195008

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.