Evidence mapPaperPMID 40573146Full record

ArticleNutrients2025

Comparison of Preconception Diet Scores Across Studies: The PrePARED Consortium.

Lixuan Ji, Janaki Sundaresan, Cailey Cranny, Ke Pan, Danielle Symons Downs, Erica P Gunderson, Gita Mishra, Abigail Pauley, Kaitlin S Potts, James M Shikany and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lixuan JiSchool of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Janaki SundaresanDepartment of Epidemiology, Celia Scott Weatherhead Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Cailey CrannyDepartment of Epidemiology, Celia Scott Weatherhead Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Ke PanDepartment of Epidemiology, Celia Scott Weatherhead Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2667-9026
Danielle Symons DownsDepartment of Kinesiology, College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1294-9742
Erica P GundersonDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2039-1964
Gita MishraSchool of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9610-5904
Abigail PauleyDepartment of Kinesiology, College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Kaitlin S PottsDepartment of Epidemiology, Celia Scott Weatherhead Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7778-4884
James M ShikanyDivision of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2424-9308
Daniela Sotres-AlvarezDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA.
Lauren A WiseDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Emily W HarvilleDepartment of Epidemiology, Celia Scott Weatherhead Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0319-0922

Funding

Vitamix Foundation none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreconception diet and nutritional status are important determinants of reproductive and pregnancy health. As a comprehensive evaluation, this paper describes harmonization of diet data across multiple cohorts including over 50,000 participants and the differences between them. This information may be useful for developing targeted strategies to improve women's diet prior to pregnancy for optimal prenatal health outcomes.

methodsThe Preconception Period Analysis of Risks and Exposures influencing health and Development (PrePARED) consortium incorporates studies covering the preconception period and includes both couples planning pregnancy and studies covering the reproductive period but not focused on pregnancy. We harmonized data on 56,520 participants from seven cohort studies that collected data during the preconception period. We generated data on diet quality according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) nutrition checklist to examine diet quality measures across the cohorts and compare estimates of diet quality across studies. Four studies used food frequency questionnaires; one used a study-specific diet history; one used two 24 h dietary recalls; and one used a short series of general diet questions. Positive responses on the six FIGO questions were tallied to calculate a total diet quality score.

resultsCohort samples varied in terms of age; socioeconomic status; race; ethnicity; and geographic region. Across the cohorts, participants met a median of three or four of the FIGO criteria for diet quality; those most commonly met were recommendations for consumption of meat and protein, while those least commonly met were recommendations for limiting consumption of processed foods and snacks. There was greater variation in meeting recommendations for the consumption of fruits and vegetables; dairy; fish; and whole grains. The percentage meeting ≤ 2 criteria ranged from 6.4% (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) to 40.4% (Bogalusa Heart Study). DISCUSSION: There was wide variability across preconception cohort studies in the extent to which participants met FIGO dietary guidelines. Although studies were conducted in populations that were not likely to be malnourished, it was rare for women to meet all the preconception dietary recommendations. These findings illustrate a need for strategies to promote meeting dietary guidelines prior to conception to improve health outcomes.

Indexed as

DietDiet, HealthyPreconception CareAdultCohort StudiesDiet SurveysFemaleHumansNutritional StatusPregnancyYoung Adultdata harmonizationdietdietary guidelinesnutritionpreconception

Identifiers

PMID40573146
PMCPMC12196022

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.