Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40573182›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Recent HPLC-UV Approaches for Cannabinoid Analysis: From Extraction to Method Validation and Quantification Compliance.

Eduarda M P Silva, Antonella Vitiello, Agnese Miro, Carlos J A Ribeiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eduarda M P SilvaAssociate Laboratory i4HB-Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, University Institute of Health Sciences-CESPU, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3759-0505
Antonella VitielloDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Agnese MiroDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Carlos J A RibeiroAssociate Laboratory i4HB-Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, University Institute of Health Sciences-CESPU, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8002-910X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the 1990s, cannabis has experienced a gradual easing of access restrictions, accompanied by the expansion of its legalization and commercialization. This shift has led to the proliferation of cannabis-based products, available as cosmetics, food supplements, and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Consequently, there has been a growing demand for reliable and reproducible extraction techniques alongside precise analytical methods for detecting and quantifying cannabinoids, both of which are essential for ensuring consumer safety and product quality. Given the variability in extraction and quantification techniques across laboratories, significant attention has recently been directed toward method validation. Validated methods ensure precise cannabinoid measurement in cannabis-based products, supporting compliance with dosage guidelines and legal limits. Thus, this review highlights recent advancements in these areas, with a particular focus on High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) coupled with Ultraviolet (UV) detection, as it is considered the gold standard for cannabinoid analysis included in cannabis monographs present in several pharmacopeias. The research focused on studies published between January 2022 and December 2024, sourced from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, that employed an HPLC-UV analytical technique for the detection of phytocannabinoids. Additionally, the review examines cannabinoid extraction techniques and the validation methodologies used by the authors in the selected papers. Notably, ultrasound extraction has emerged as the most widely utilized technique across various matrices, with Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) offering a promising, efficient, and environmentally friendly extraction alternative. Analytical chromatographic separations continue to be predominantly conducted using C18 reversed-phase columns. Nevertheless, in recent years, researchers have explored various stationary phases, particularly to achieve the enantioseparation of cannabinoids.

Indexed as

cannabinoidscannabisextractionHPLCUVvalidation

Identifiers

PMID40573182
PMCPMC12196272

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.