Evidence mapPaperPMID 40573303Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Innovative Formulation Strategies for Biosimilars: Trends Focused on Buffer-Free Systems, Safety, Regulatory Alignment, and Intellectual Property Challenges.

Tomas Gabriel Bas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tomas Gabriel BasEscuela de Ciencias Empresariales, Universidad Catolica del Norte, Coquimbo 1780000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-6331-0730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formulation of biosimilar products critically determines their stability, safety, immunogenicity, and market accessibility. This article presents a novel integrative framework for biosimilar formulation that balances scientific, regulatory, and intellectual property dimensions, offering a holistic perspective rarely unified in the literature. It highlights the growing trend toward buffer-free, high-concentration systems that leverage protein self-buffering to improve patient comfort and formulation stability. The article also addresses regulatory flexibility from the FDA and EMA, which allows scientifically justified deviations from reference formulations to ensure pharmaceutical equivalence and minimize immunogenicity. A novelty of this article is its comprehensive analysis of how digital innovations, such as Quality-by-Design, Process-Analytical-Technology, and AI-based in silico simulations, are transforming formulation design and bioprocess optimization to reduce immunogenic risks and enhance bioequivalence. Two important key takeaways emerge: (1) strategic innovation in formulation, especially using buffer-free and high concentration systems, improve product stability and patient tolerability while complying with regulatory standards; and (2) intellectual property challenges, including patent thickets, strongly influence formulation decisions, making early legal-strategic alignment essential for market entry. The article confirms that practical recommendations for the selection of recombinant therapeutic protein formulations can effectively guide developers and regulators toward safer, more efficient, and commercially viable biosimilar products.

Indexed as

biosimilarsbuffer-free systemsexcipientsFDA/EMAhigh-concentration formulationsimmunogenicity mitigationintellectual property strategiesProcess Analytical TechnologyQuality by Design

Identifiers

PMID40573303
PMCPMC12196224

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.