Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40574198›Full record

ReviewPolymers2025

Bioinspired Nanoplatforms: Polydopamine and Exosomes for Targeted Antimicrobial Therapy.

Barathan Muttiah, Alfizah Hanafiah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Barathan MuttiahDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8861-2786
Alfizah HanafiahDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-4859-1439

Funding

National University of Malaysia DIP-2024-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global growth in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has accelerated the need for novel therapy beyond the scope of conventional antibiotics. In the last decade, polydopamine (PDA), a mussel-inspired polymer with redox capability, remarkable adhesion, and biocompatibility, has emerged as a universal antimicrobial coating with widespread uses. At the same time, extracellular vesicles (EVs) and particularly exosomes have gained prominence for their intrinsic cargo delivery and immune-modulating properties. Here, we summarize the synergistic value of PDA and exosome integration into multifunctional antimicrobial nanoplatforms. We discuss the inherent antimicrobial activity of PDA and exosomes; the advantages of PDA coating, including increased exosome stability, ROS generation, and surface functionalization; and current methodologies towards designing PDA-exosome hybrids. This review also mentions other antimicrobial polymers and nanocomposites that may be employed for exosome modification, such as quaternized chitosan, zwitterionic polymers, and polymer-metal composites. Most significant challenges, such as the maintenance of exosome integrity, coating uniformity, biocompatibility, scalability, and immunogenicity, are addressed. Finally, future research directions are highlighted, with emphasis on intelligent, stimulus-responsive coatings, AMP incorporation, and clinical translation. Collectively, this review underscores the promise of PDA-coated exosomes as potential antimicrobial therapeutics against AMR with potential applications in wound healing, implant protection, and targeted infection control.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistance (AMR)exosomeshybrid nanoplatformspolydopamine (PDA)stimuli-responsive coatings

Identifiers

PMID40574198
PMCPMC12197175

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.