Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40574696›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Differential intestinal microbiome response to heat stress in two rabbit maternal lines: a comparative analysis using Random Forest, BayesC, and PLS-DA.

Iliyass Biada, Francesco Tiezzi, Noelia Ibáñez-Escriche, María Luz García, María José Argente, María Antonia Santacreu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iliyass BiadaInstituto de Ciencia y Tecnología Animal, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.
Francesco TiezziDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Noelia Ibáñez-EscricheInstituto de Ciencia y Tecnología Animal, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6221-3576
María Luz GarcíaDepartamento de Tecnología Agroalimentaria, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Orihuela, Spain.
María José ArgenteDepartamento de Tecnología Agroalimentaria, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Orihuela, Spain.
María Antonia SantacreuInstituto de Ciencia y Tecnología Animal, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heat stress affects livestock productivity and health, particularly in rabbits, due to their physiological vulnerabilities. This study explores the relationship between environmental conditions, genetic lines backgrounds, and soft fecal microbiota. A 2 × 2 factorial design was used, involving 2 maternal rabbit lines: A (standard longevity line) and LP (high longevity line), exposed to heat stress and thermal comfort. Samples were analyzed with multiple models to assess the impact of heat stress on microbiota by comparing microbial diversity and evaluating the classification performance of Random Forest, Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA), and Bayesian Regression (BayesC). Heat stress influenced microbial diversity in both lines, increasing alpha diversity and driving significant beta-diversity shifts (2.3% variance, P < 0.001). This could be due to intestinal barrier disruption, which facilitate pathogen proliferation. The high longevity line LP exhibited higher richness under thermal comfort, whereas heat stress equalized these differences between lines, possibly due to increased pathogen proliferation in the low longevity line A. These differences in response to heat stress may be influenced by the crosstalk between microbiota and host genetics, shaping distinct adaptive mechanisms in each line. Prediction accuracy and key selected variables distinguishing between lines A and LP varied across thermal conditions, with the area under the curve exceeding 0.92 under heat stress and 0.87 in thermal comfort. This reflects different microbiome regulations between the 2 lines under heat stress. Potential stress-associated taxa such as Erysipelatoclostridium and Monoglobus were more abundant in the low longevity line A. These results highlight LP's higher longevity and expected resilience, while line A's susceptibility is reflected in a higher abundance of heat stress-associated taxa in the latter. This underscores soft fecal microbiota as a potential biomarker for heat stress resilience and emphasizes the role of host-microbiota interactions in mediating genetic-environmental responses. Additionally, this study highlights the value of combining modeling approaches, which enhance accuracy and reveal key taxa driving heat stress responses. Among the models tested, PLS-DA achieved the highest accuracy, while Random Forest identified a smaller yet biologically relevant subset of taxa, providing valuable phylogenetic and taxonomic insights.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeHeat-Shock ResponseHot TemperatureAnimalsBayes TheoremFecesFemaleRabbitsRandom Forestclassification modelsLongevitymicrobiotarabbitsresiliencethermal conditions

Identifiers

PMID40574696
PMCPMC12267140

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.