ArticleCureus2025
The Effect of Patient-Provider Relationships on Compliance in Uncontrolled Diabetic Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of Self-Care Self-Efficacy in Adults Familiar with Palliative Care: The Role of Patient-Centered Communication, Health, and Well-Being.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Effective patient-provider communication is critical for managing chronic diseases like diabetes mellitus (DM). This study examines whether patient attitudes toward their healthcare providers influence diabetes management and compliance, comparing individuals with poorly managed diabetes mellitus (PM DM) and those without DM (No DM). Methods Data from the All of Us Research Program was analyzed. After excluding incomplete responses, the final sample included 1903 PM DM patients and 94,218 No DM patients. Patient perceptions of respect, involvement in medical decision making, and provider interactions were assessed. Bivariate analysis was used to identify responses that were independently associated with PM DM. Variables found to be independently associated with PM DM at p<0.10 were entered into a multivariable model, and backwards stepwise binary logistic regression was used to find the model of best fit. Variables found to be significant (p<0.05) in the multivariable model were retained. Results Patients who felt disrespected by providers were significantly more likely to have poorly managed diabetes (OR = 1.396, 95% CI: 1.189, 1.639, p<0.05). Counterintuitively, patients who reported always being asked for their opinion in treatment decisions were likely to have PM DM (OR = 1.466, 95% CI: 1.235, 1.740, p<0.05). Patients who were not nervous to see their provider were also more likely to have PM DM (OR = 1.365, 95% CI: 1.152, 1.618, p<0.05). Conclusion Findings suggest that positive provider interaction does not always translate to better disease control. Future studies should explore how communication styles and shared decision-making impact long-term adherence to diabetes treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.