Evidence mapPaperPMID 40575268Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Cost-effective screening strategy to prevent venous thromboembolism in combined oral contraceptive users.

Jonathan Douxfils

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Chapter 3. Impact of estrogens on hemostasis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jonathan DouxfilsResearch Unit in Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology (URPC), NAmur Research Institute for LIfe Sciences (NARILIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, with a significant societal and economic burden. Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) increase VTE risk by 2- to 6-fold, resulting in approximately 22,925 cases annually in the European Economic Area (EEA). Despite the high associated healthcare costs, which may reach 2.5 billion EUR annually, current international guidelines, including those from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH), discourage routine thrombophilia screening prior to COC prescription, citing low cost-effectiveness, low prevalence of thrombophilia, and potential unintended consequences, such as reduced contraceptive use. Recent advancements in screening technology challenge these guidelines. The normalized Activated Protein C sensitivity ratio (nAPCsr) assay, a low-cost tool capable of detecting both inherited thrombophilia and acquired COC-induced activated protein C (APC) resistance, offers a promising strategy for targeted screening. Economic models estimate that implementing nAPCsr-based screening could prevent up to 13,500 VTE cases annually, leading to 1.5 billion EUR in annual healthcare savings. Additionally, nAPCsr-guided contraceptive counseling enables personalized decision-making, directing high-risk women toward safer contraceptive options, such as progestin-only pills or COCs containing natural estrogens (estradiol or estetrol), which present a lower thrombotic risk. This manuscript emphasizes the necessity of updating current prevention strategies by integrating innovative screening tools like the nAPCsr assay. By addressing both direct healthcare costs and indirect costs related to productivity loss and long-term complications, such a strategy could improve patient safety, reduce the financial burden on healthcare systems, and promote equitable access to safer contraceptive methods. Furthermore, targeted screening could alleviate the underrepresentation of high-risk women in current cost estimates and significantly mitigate the societal impact of COC-associated VTE. In light of these findings, reconsidering current policy recommendations appears essential to facilitate evidence-based, cost-effective prevention of COC-related thrombotic events, ultimately enhancing public health outcomes.

Indexed as

Contraceptives, Oral, CombinedCost-Benefit AnalysisMass ScreeningVenous ThromboembolismFemaleHumansThrombophiliaContraceptives, Oral, Combinedcombined oral contraceptivescost-effectivenessnormalized activated protein c sensitivity ratiothrombophilia screeningvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID40575268
PMCPMC12197920

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.