ArticleRwanda journal of medicine and health sciences2025
Satisfaction with Prosthesis and Walking Ability among Trans-Tibial Prosthesis Users from Two Selected Rehabilitation Hospitals in Rwanda.
Article in Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Satisfaction with the prosthesis is the key element to using the prosthesis for better walking and performing daily activities among transtibial prosthesis users. Different factors affect satisfaction and walking ability. Objective: To evaluate satisfaction and assess walking ability among transtibial prosthesis users from two rehabilitation hospitals in Rwanda. Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted on 45 transtibial prosthesis users who received their prostheses from the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali and Gatagara Orthopedics and Rehabilitation Hospital, Nyanza. The research was done from February 1, 2024, to April 30, 2024. The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience-Revised (TAPES-R) was utilized to evaluate satisfaction whereas the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and the 2 minutes' walk test (2MWT) were used for walking ability assessment. Results: Out of 45 participants, 71.1% (n=32) were males and the remaining were females. On satisfaction with prosthesis, 62.2% were satisfied while 37.8% were unsatisfied. The satisfaction was statistically significantly associated with shape (p≤0.001), appearance (p≤0.003), weight (p≤0.001), usefulness (p≤0.027), reliability (p≤0.035), fit (p≤0.001), and comfort (p≤0.038) of their prosthesis, their health status (p≤0.011) and physical status (p≤0.001). For walking ability, 60% of the participants demonstrated moderate walking ability. Conclusion: Some transtibial prosthesis users were unsatisfied with their prosthesis. Moderate walking ability was observed generally. More rehabilitation including gait training, physiotherapy, early prosthetic fitting, rehabilitation team follow-ups and use of advanced prosthetic technology are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.