ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients without cirrhosis.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex Differences in Mortality Among Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- The Malaysian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Consensus Statements on Prevention and Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Malaysia.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Review
- Cannabidiol-Ion Channel Interactions Represent a Promising Preventive and Therapeutic Strategy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026Review
- Lapatinib Promotes Apoptosis in Hepatoma Cells by Regulating SPP1 Expression.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Impact of alcohol-associated and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver diseases upon hepatic disorder and carcinogenesis in the current era.World journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer, the sixth most common cancer worldwide, and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Cirrhosis is the predominant risk factor for HCC, driven by major etiologies including hepatitis B and C, excessive alcohol consumption, and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). While approximately 80% of HCC cases occur in patients with cirrhosis, its incidence among individuals without cirrhosis has significantly increased, particularly in developed countries, driven by the rising prevalence of MASLD. The prevalence of patients with non-cirrhotic HCC varies geographically, yet data on this subgroup remain limited. Consequently, screening and clinical management guidelines for patients with non-cirrhotic HCC are underdeveloped. Current surveillance is typically not recommended for non-cirrhotic populations, except for individuals with hepatitis B, and diagnostic criteria like Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System are designed explicitly for cirrhotic or hepatitis B-associated HCC. Furthermore, treatment strategies for non-cirrhotic HCC are often extrapolated from studies focused on patients with cirrhosis, leading to gaps in knowledge regarding treatment efficacy, survival outcomes, and etiological variability in non-cirrhotic cohorts. Thus, emerging evidence must be reviewed to guide the development of enhanced diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for patients with non-cirrhotic HCC. To address these gaps, we comprehensively reviewed the epidemiology, clinical and genetic characteristics, diagnostic modalities, and therapeutic approaches for patients with non-cirrhotic HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.