ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2025
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study employed in silico methods to investigate the anticancer potential and mechanisms of twenty novel phosphinogold(I) thiocarbohydrate complexes. Methods: Molecular docking and Prime MM-GBSA screening of seventeen cancer-related protein targets, including Human Double Minute 2 protein (HDM2), DNA methyltransferase-1 (DNMT1), Protein Kinase B (AKT2), and Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1), were conducted. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed for complex Results: Virtual screening revealed strong binding affinities for several complexes, often surpassing native ligands. All the complexes except Discussion: These findings provide valuable insights into multi-target anticancer mechanisms, with a particular emphasis on complex Conclusion: The paradoxical effect of acetylation underscores the importance of balancing lipophilicity and binding strength in ligand design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.