ArticleNIHR open research2025
Incidence, outcomes and management of spontaneous haemoperitoneum in pregnancy: a UK population-based study.
Article in NIHR open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of evidence from the UK Obstetric Surveillance System in policy and clinical practice: a descriptive study using citation tracking.NIHR open research · 2026Article
- Incidence, outcomes and management of spontaneous haemoperitoneum in pregnancy: a UK population-based study.NIHR open research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spontaneous haemoperitoneum in pregnancy (SHiP) is the occurrence during pregnancy of sudden intra-abdominal haemorrhage unrelated to extrauterine pregnancy, trauma or uterine rupture. SHiP is uncommon but is associated with preterm birth, high perinatal mortality and, more rarely, maternal mortality. We investigated the incidence of SHiP in the UK and its diagnosis, management and outcomes. Methods: This two-year, prospective surveillance study used the UK Obstetric Surveillance System to collect anonymous data on all women who gave birth in a UK consultant-led maternity unit in 2016 and 2017 and who experienced SHiP. Results: We confirmed 20 cases of SHiP, giving an estimated incidence of 1.3 cases per 100,000 maternities, or 1 per 75,614 maternities. The median gestational age at diagnosis was 35.7 weeks (IQR 29.9-38.4 weeks). A minority of affected women were receiving anticoagulant agents for prophylaxis (2/20) or treatment (4/20). The most common initial suspected diagnosis was placental abruption (7/20), followed by intra-abdominal bleeding, uterine rupture, or infection. SHiP was diagnosed using ultrasound in four women, using CT in five, and solely at surgery in 14. Aneurysms (4/20) and organ rupture or haematoma (5/20) were the most common bleeding source, and the condition was most commonly diagnosed and treated by laparotomy (11/20). Perinatal morbidity and mortality were high, with 16% of infants stillborn, an over 80% admission rate to the neonatal unit among the 16 live-born infants, major complications in a third of these infants, and one neonatal death. Maternal morbidity was also high, with 60% of women admitted to the intensive care unit, over half of whom experienced major morbidity, and one maternal death. Conclusions: SHiP is rare in the UK but when it occurs, it can be associated with major maternal morbidity and mortality, and perinatal outcomes are poor. International comparisons are complicated by differing definitions of SHiP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.