Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40575469›Full record

ArticleCurrent epidemiology reports2025

A Review of the Causal Decomposition Framework for Modeling Interventions that Reduce Disparities.

Michelle M Qin, John W Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current epidemiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Causal Inference in Health Disparities Research.Annual review of public health · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michelle M QinDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.ORCID 0000-0003-0391-6527
John W JacksonDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.ORCID 0000-0002-1528-7003

Funding

Analytic Methods to Inform Interventions that Reduce Cardiovascular Health DisparitiesR01HL169956 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI John William Jackson · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL169956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: This review summarizes recent developments in causal decomposition analysis (CDA), a modeling framework for reducing disparities. Rather than Recent Findings: CDA has been applied to disparities in health, sociology, education, and computer science. The CDA framework consists of four steps: formulating a meaningful estimand, articulating identification assumptions to link an appropriate dataset with the estimand, choosing an appropriate estimator, and conducting statistical inference. Estimators have been developed for various types of data and to address particular statistical challenges. However, some estimators adjust for all available covariates in all parts of the model, without discussing ethical implications. Meanwhile, the literature has covered some but not all potential violations of standard CDA modeling assumptions. Summary: CDA builds on previous methods for studying disparities by articulating causal estimands that transparently reflect implicit value judgements about health disparities. This review outlines the broad framework of CDA methodology, selected implementations, practical considerations, and current limitations and alternatives.

Indexed as

AllowabilityCausalityDecompositionDisparitiesInterventions

Identifiers

PMID40575469
PMCPMC12201975

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.