ArticleApplications in plant sciences
Using large language models to extract plant functional traits from unstructured text.
Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Making floras computable: Audited translation of flora of China as reusable taxonomic knowledge.Plant diversity · 2026Article
- Article
- Using large language models to extract plant functional traits from unstructured text.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
- Fully automatic extraction of morphological traits from the web: Utopia or reality?Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premise: Functional plant ecology seeks to understand how functional traits govern species distributions, community assembly, and ecosystem functions. While global trait datasets have advanced the field, substantial gaps remain, and extracting trait information from text in books, research articles, and online sources via machine learning offers a valuable complement to costly field campaigns. Methods: We propose a natural language processing pipeline that extracts traits from unstructured species descriptions by using classification models for categorical traits and question-answering models for numerical traits. The pipeline's performance is evaluated on two large databases with over 50,000 species descriptions, utilizing approaches ranging from a keyword search to large language models. Results: Our final optimized pipeline used a transformer architecture and obtained a mean precision of 90.8% (range 81.6-97%) and a mean recall of 88.6% (77.4-97%) across five categorical traits, representing a 9.83% increase in precision and 42.35% increase in recall over a regular expression-based approach. The question-answering model yielded a normalized mean absolute error of 10.3% averaged across three numerical traits. Discussion: The natural language processing pipeline we propose has the potential to facilitate the digitization and extraction of large amounts of plant functional trait information residing in scattered textual descriptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.