Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40576243›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

Heritable Tissue-Specific Gene Expression Associates With Chronic Wound Microbial Species.

Khalid Omeir, Jacob Ancira, Rebecca Gabrilska, Craig Tipton, Clint Miller, Ashley Noe, Kumudu Subasinghe, Megan Rowe, Nicole Phillips, Joseph Wolcott and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Heritable Tissue-Specific Gene Expression Associates With Chronic Wound Microbial Species.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Khalid OmeirDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Jacob AnciraDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Rebecca GabrilskaDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Craig TiptonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Clint MillerSouthwest Regional Wound Care Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Ashley NoeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Kumudu SubasingheMicrobiology, Immunology & Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-1993
Megan RoweMicrobiology, Immunology & Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5962-1229
Nicole PhillipsMicrobiology, Immunology & Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Joseph WolcottSouthwest Regional Wound Care Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Caleb D PhilipsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

Funding

Patient Genetic Determinants of Chronic Wound Microbiome CompositionR15GM141973 · NIGMS · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS, CALEB DAKOTAH · 2021 to 2021
$421k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM141973NIH HHS R15GM141973-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reasons for interpatient variability in chronic wound microbiome composition are thought to be complex but are poorly known. To investigate how patients' genetically regulated tissue expression may influence chronic wound bacterial composition, we performed a microbiome-transcriptome-wide association study. This approach involved estimating for 509 patients their tissue-specific gene expression from DNA genotypes, followed by associating gene expression to the relative abundances of species detected in their wounds as provided on clinical reports to the physician. Comparisons to artery, blood, fibroblast, skeletal muscle, skin, subcutaneous fat, and nerve tissue resulted in 251 transcriptional differences at 109 genes significantly explaining abundances of 39 different species. Overall, these species were detected in ~63% of wounds. A similar number of associations per tissue was observed (range 31-39), and many genes were associated at multiple tissues in distinct ways. The cumulative variance across loci for species relative abundance explained ranged from ~5%-36%, depending on species. Although the same gene was almost never associated with more than one species, ~14% of enriched pathways were independently enriched for multiple species, which may reflect the diversity of ways microbes interact with partially overlapping attributes of the wound bed. Commonly enriched pathways pertained to collagen formation and modification, cell signalling, cytoskeletal dynamics, interactions with extracellular matrix, transmembrane proteins, amongst others. This work expands the new perspective that individual genetics may partially determine microbial colonisation and infection.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaWound HealingWound InfectionWounds and InjuriesAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleMiddle AgedTranscriptomechronic wound microbiomembTWASmicrobiome‐genome association

Identifiers

PMID40576243
PMCPMC12203766

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.