ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
Heritable Tissue-Specific Gene Expression Associates With Chronic Wound Microbial Species.
Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammation and wound healing: a comprehensive overview of mechanisms, therapeutic strategies, and translational perspectives.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Wounds and the Microbiota: The Healing Interplay Between Host and Microbial Communities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Heritable Tissue-Specific Gene Expression Associates With Chronic Wound Microbial Species.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The reasons for interpatient variability in chronic wound microbiome composition are thought to be complex but are poorly known. To investigate how patients' genetically regulated tissue expression may influence chronic wound bacterial composition, we performed a microbiome-transcriptome-wide association study. This approach involved estimating for 509 patients their tissue-specific gene expression from DNA genotypes, followed by associating gene expression to the relative abundances of species detected in their wounds as provided on clinical reports to the physician. Comparisons to artery, blood, fibroblast, skeletal muscle, skin, subcutaneous fat, and nerve tissue resulted in 251 transcriptional differences at 109 genes significantly explaining abundances of 39 different species. Overall, these species were detected in ~63% of wounds. A similar number of associations per tissue was observed (range 31-39), and many genes were associated at multiple tissues in distinct ways. The cumulative variance across loci for species relative abundance explained ranged from ~5%-36%, depending on species. Although the same gene was almost never associated with more than one species, ~14% of enriched pathways were independently enriched for multiple species, which may reflect the diversity of ways microbes interact with partially overlapping attributes of the wound bed. Commonly enriched pathways pertained to collagen formation and modification, cell signalling, cytoskeletal dynamics, interactions with extracellular matrix, transmembrane proteins, amongst others. This work expands the new perspective that individual genetics may partially determine microbial colonisation and infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.