SynthesisPloS one2025
Association between N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels and outcomes of ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundN-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was identified as an important biomarker of cardiovascular disease, in ischemic stroke. This study intends to assess the association of NT-proBNP levels with clinical outcomes of patients ischemic stroke patients.
methodsA comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane CENTRAL electronic databases was done for papers published till April 2024 and reporting on the levels of NT-proBNP in patients with ischemic stroke. Outcomes of interest included mortality (all-cause and cardiovascular) and neurological, and functional outcomes. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used, and final estimates were reported as pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
resultsElevated NT-proBNP levels were significantly linked to increased all-cause (pooled OR = 2.322, 95% CI: 1.718 to 2.925) and cardiovascular mortality (pooled OR = 1.797, 95% CI: 1.161 to 2.433). Higher NT-proBNP levels were also related to poorer functional outcomes (pooled OR = 1.129, 95% CI: 1.041 to 1.217). Patients with higher NT-proBNP levels had somewhat worse neurological outcomes (pooled OR = 1.317, 95% CI: 0.859 to 1.774). Considerable heterogeneity was detected across the studies (I² > 40% in most analyses).
conclusionNT-proBNP levels may serve as a robust predictor of mortality and offer potential utility in predicting functional recovery in ischemic stroke patients. The integration of NT-proBNP measurement into clinical settings may be beneficial for risk stratification and management of stroke survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.