Evidence mapPaperPMID 40577367Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Machine learning for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth using early second and third trimester maternal blood gene expression: A cautionary tale.

Kylie K Hornaday, Ty Werbicki, Suzanne C Tough, Stephen L Wood, David W Anderson, Constance H Li, Donna M Slater

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kylie K HornadayDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0876-5417
Ty WerbickiDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Suzanne C ToughDepartment of Community of Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Stephen L WoodDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
David W AndersonDepartment of Science, Langara College, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Constance H LiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Donna M SlaterDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) remains a significant global health challenge and a leading cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Despite advancements in neonatal care, the prediction of sPTB remains elusive, in part due to complex etiologies and heterogeneous patient populations. This study aimed to validate and extend information on gene expression biomarkers previously described for predicting sPTB using maternal whole blood from the All Our Families pregnancy cohort study based in Calgary, Canada. The results of this study are two-fold: first, using additional replicates of maternal blood samples from the All Our Families cohort, we were unable to repeat the findings of a 2016 study which identified top maternal gene expression predictors for sPTB. Second, we conducted a secondary analysis of the original gene expression dataset from the 2016 study using five modelling approaches (random forest, elastic net regression, unregularized logistic regression, L2-regularized logistic regression, and multilayer perceptron neural network) followed by external validation using a pregnancy cohort based in Detroit, USA. The top performing model (random forest classification) suggested promising performance (area under the receiver operating curve, AUROC 0.99 in the training set), but performance was significantly degraded on the test set (AUROC 0.54) and further degraded in external validation (AUROC 0.50), suggesting poor generalizability, likely due to overfitting exacerbated by a low feature-to-noise ratio. Similar performance was observed in the other four learning models. Prediction was not improved when using higher complexity machine learning (e.g., neural network) approaches over traditional statistical learning (e.g., logistic regression). These findings underscore the challenges in translating biomarker discovery into clinically useful predictive models for sPTB. This study highlights the critical need for rigorous methodological safeguards and external validation in biomarker research. It also emphasizes the impact of data noise and overfitting on model performance, particularly in high-dimensional omics datasets. Future research should prioritize robust validation strategies and explore mechanistic insights to improve our understanding and prediction of sPTB.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPregnancy Trimester, SecondPregnancy Trimester, ThirdPremature BirthAdultBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyROC CurveBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID40577367
PMCPMC12204558

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.