ArticleNeurology2025
Time Course and Severity of Cognitive Changes as a Function of Aβ Positivity and
Article in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contributions of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative to advancing AD research: a targeted review of recent publications.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesAPOE4 is the strongest genetic risk factor of sporadic Alzheimer disease (AD), associated with greater β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition and accelerated cognitive decline, especially in episodic memory. However, it remains unclear whether this decline is driven by increased Aβ burden in APOE4 carriers or by greater susceptibility to Aβ-related effects. In this study, we examined whether the accelerated decline in episodic memory among APOE4 carriers is due to increased Aβ deposition or heightened susceptibility to Aβ-related effects.
methodsWe analyzed data from individuals in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative who underwent neuropsychological assessments, Aβ PET imaging, and APOE genotyping. Using sampled iterative local approximation, we estimated Aβ duration, defined as the number of years each individual was amyloid positive (Aβ+). Using these estimates, we examined its impact on cognitive trajectories across multiple domains, including episodic memory, executive function, processing speed, visuospatial abilities, semantic memory, and crystallized intelligence.
resultsWe analyzed data from 1,542 participants (mean age = 72.2 years, SD = 7.2; 50.8% female; mean education = 16.3 years, SD = 2.6) and found that APOE4 was associated with steeper declines in episodic memory as a function of Aβ duration. Homozygous APOE4 carriers (4/4) exhibited the most pronounced decline, followed by heterozygotes (3/4), with noncarriers (3/3) showing the slowest decline. This genotype-dependent pattern was specific to episodic memory; no consistent or meaningful differences were observed across other cognitive domains. In all genotype groups, episodic memory was the first domain to show impairment. However, the lag between memory decline and subsequent nonmemory decline was substantially longer in APOE homozygote individuals compared with the other groups, suggesting a more domain-specific vulnerability early in the disease process. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that APOE4 carriers, particularly homozygotes, exhibit reduced cognitive resilience to Aβ accumulation, but that this effect is largely specific to episodic memory. These findings indicate that cognitive trajectories in AD differ by APOE genotype, highlighting the importance of examining clinical symptoms in the context of APOE status. Future research should investigate whether these differences are driven by distinct pathologic mechanisms in APOE4 carriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.