Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40579043›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025

Deep Learning-Based Prediction of PET Amyloid Status Using MRI.

Donghoon Kim, Jon André Ottesen, Ashwin Kumar, Brandon C Ho, Elsa Bismuth, Christina B Young, Elizabeth Mormino, Greg Zaharchuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Donghoon KimFrom the Department of Radiology (D.K., J.A.O., A.K., B.C.H., E.B., G.Z.), Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5479-2707
Jon André OttesenFrom the Department of Radiology (D.K., J.A.O., A.K., B.C.H., E.B., G.Z.), Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Ashwin KumarFrom the Department of Radiology (D.K., J.A.O., A.K., B.C.H., E.B., G.Z.), Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Brandon C HoFrom the Department of Radiology (D.K., J.A.O., A.K., B.C.H., E.B., G.Z.), Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1202-2613
Elsa BismuthFrom the Department of Radiology (D.K., J.A.O., A.K., B.C.H., E.B., G.Z.), Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Christina B YoungDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (C.B.Y., E.M.), Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9535-2137
Elizabeth MorminoDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (C.B.Y., E.M.), Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4542-6537
Greg ZaharchukFrom the Department of Radiology (D.K., J.A.O., A.K., B.C.H., E.B., G.Z.), Stanford University, Stanford, California gregz@stanford.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5781-8848

Funding

MVP Data Integration into the ADSP Phenotype Harmonization ConsortiumU24AG074855 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CUCCARO, MICHAEL L, HOHMAN, TIMOTHY J · 2021 to 2025
$37.5M
Stanford Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterAdmin Supp: Developing iPSC models for AD and PDP30AG066515 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Victor Henderson · 2020 to 2026
$29.0M
AI-Enhanced Brain PET Imaging for Alzheimer's DiseaseR56AG071558 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ZAHARCHUK, GREGORY GEORGE · 2022 to 2023
$1.6M
Regional tau deposition and digital assessment of cognition in preclinical AD and MCIK99AG071837 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, CHRISTINA B · 2022 to 2023
$256k
NIA NIH HHS K99 AG071837NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066515NIA NIH HHS R56 AG071558NIA NIH HHS U24 AG074855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIdentifying amyloid-beta (Aβ)-positive patients is essential for Alzheimer disease clinical trials and disease-modifying treatments but currently requires PET or CSF sampling. Previous MRI-based deep learning models using only T1-weighted (T1w) images have shown moderate performance. MATERIALS AND

methodsMulticontrast MRI- and PET-based quantitative Aβ deposition were retrospectively obtained from 3 public data sets: ADNI, OASIS3, and A4. Aβ positivity was defined using the recommended Centiloid threshold of each data set. Two EfficientNet models were trained to predict amyloid-positivity: one by using only T1w images and another incorporating both T1w and T2 FLAIR. Model performance was assessed using an internal held-out test set, evaluating area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. External validation was conducted using an independent cohort from Stanford Alzheimer Disease Research Center. DeLong and McNemar tests were used to compare AUC and accuracy, respectively.

resultsA total of 4056 examinations (mean age: 71.6 [SD, 6.3] years; 55% female; 55% amyloid-positive) were used for network development, and 149 examinations were used for external testing (mean age: 72.1 [SD] 9.6] years; 57% female; 56% amyloid-positive). The multicontrast model outperformed the single-technique model in the internal held-out test set (AUC: 0.67; 95% CI, 0.65-0.70;

conclusionsThe use of multicontrast MRI, specifically incorporating T2 FLAIR in addition to T1w images, significantly improved the predictive accuracy of PET-determined amyloid status from MRIs by using a deep learning approach.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAmyloid beta-Peptides

Identifiers

PMID40579043
PMCPMC12688020

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.