ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
Deep Learning-Based Prediction of PET Amyloid Status Using MRI.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peripheral and Central miRNA Signatures in Alzheimer's Disease: Tissue-Specific Variability, Sex-Associated Differences, and Implications for Blood-Based Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Image-Level Harmonization Methods for Multi-Center MR Neuroimaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Review of deep learning models for Alzheimer's disease detection: MRI-centric approaches and multimodal extensions.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeIdentifying amyloid-beta (Aβ)-positive patients is essential for Alzheimer disease clinical trials and disease-modifying treatments but currently requires PET or CSF sampling. Previous MRI-based deep learning models using only T1-weighted (T1w) images have shown moderate performance. MATERIALS AND
methodsMulticontrast MRI- and PET-based quantitative Aβ deposition were retrospectively obtained from 3 public data sets: ADNI, OASIS3, and A4. Aβ positivity was defined using the recommended Centiloid threshold of each data set. Two EfficientNet models were trained to predict amyloid-positivity: one by using only T1w images and another incorporating both T1w and T2 FLAIR. Model performance was assessed using an internal held-out test set, evaluating area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. External validation was conducted using an independent cohort from Stanford Alzheimer Disease Research Center. DeLong and McNemar tests were used to compare AUC and accuracy, respectively.
resultsA total of 4056 examinations (mean age: 71.6 [SD, 6.3] years; 55% female; 55% amyloid-positive) were used for network development, and 149 examinations were used for external testing (mean age: 72.1 [SD] 9.6] years; 57% female; 56% amyloid-positive). The multicontrast model outperformed the single-technique model in the internal held-out test set (AUC: 0.67; 95% CI, 0.65-0.70;
conclusionsThe use of multicontrast MRI, specifically incorporating T2 FLAIR in addition to T1w images, significantly improved the predictive accuracy of PET-determined amyloid status from MRIs by using a deep learning approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.