ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2025
Subjective Assessment of the Pyloric Sphincter During Endoscopy and Its Correlation with FLIP Panometry.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- EndoFLIP Guided Assessment of Pyloric Distensibility Identifies Associations With Delayed Gastric Emptying and Symptoms of Gastroparesis.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
- The effectiveness of the diazo reaction in the determination of tip-end position after blind insertion of the nasoenteric tube by ICU nurses: A prospective comparative study.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
- Comment on "Subjective Assessment of the Pyloric Sphincter During Endoscopy and Its Correlation with FLIP Panometry".Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVisual or haptic assessments of the pylorus during endoscopy may result in the diagnosis of a pylorospasm. However, subjective assessments may be affected by inter-rater variability, the antro-duodenal motility phase and the distance to scope. We evaluated to what extent the visual impression, the endoscopic resistance to pyloric intubation and gastric contents correlate with objectively determined values using EndoFLIP measurements.
methodsPatients scheduled for FLIP panometry of the upper gastrointestinal tract due to esophageal or epigastric conditions from January 2021 until November 2022 were considered for the study. Inclusion criteria were an EndoFLIP measurement of the pylorus using a standardized protocol for distensibility assessment and documented subjective assessments during upper endoscopy. Statistical analyses including MANOVA and logistic regression were performed for group comparisons and to evaluate significance.
resultsA total of 184 patients (56% female; mean age 49 ± 17.6 years) were included. The subjective assessment modalities of gastric and pyloric dimensions during endoscopy demonstrated high specificity (> 80%) but low sensitivity (< 50%) in detecting pylorospasm. Group comparisons and post hoc tests revealed no consistent significance between different subjective ratings. Logistic regression analysis showed that objectively determined measurements of pyloric dimensions using FLIP panometry were superior to subjective assessments in identifying pyloric dysfunction.
conclusionSubjective assessments of the pylorus during endoscopy are not reliable for diagnosing pyloric dysfunction, such as pylorospasm. This highlights the importance of measurements, not estimates, in the evaluation of pyloric function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.