SynthesisEuropean journal of public health2025
Social vulnerability indices for proactively identifying at-risk individuals in healthcare: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Socioeconomic position and employment status in patients with lung cancer - a register-based study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social vulnerability indices (SVIs) have the potential to guide risk stratification and support socially differentiated interventions to improve healthcare equity. However, their applicability in clinical settings remains uncertain. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from individual-level SVIs, focusing on (1) how social vulnerability is defined, (2) the domains and items covered, and (3) their ability to predict poor health outcomes. We searched the Medline, PsycInfo, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to 31 January 2024 for studies linking individual-based SVIs with poor health outcomes in adult populations in Europe, North America, and Australasia. Data were extracted independently by two authors, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. A narrative synthesis addressed the review's aims, with thematic synthesis for the first two and a vote-counting approach for the third. Most SVIs included domains like income, social support, living situation, and educational attainment, with over 50% covering these factors. A consistent association was found between higher social vulnerability and poorer health outcomes. However, none of the identified SVIs were prospectively tested in clinical settings. The overall certainty of evidence was assessed as low due to retrospective study designs and significant heterogeneity. This review highlights the potential of SVIs to predict poor health outcomes, though their lack of prospective validation limits current use. Future research should focus on adapting and testing SVIs that prioritize key socioeconomic and social support domains while adopting a simple and pragmatic approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.