ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Whole-genome phenotype prediction with machine learning: open problems in bacterial genomics.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phylogeny-agnostic strain-level prediction of phage-host interactions from genomes using machine learning.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- ALPAR: automated learning pipeline for antimicrobial resistance.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- A genome-wide association study to identify the genetic loci underlying carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- A leakage-aware genomic prediction pipeline for meropenem resistance inBioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Biased sampling driven by bacterial population structure confounds machine learning prediction of antimicrobial resistance.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Bacterial Systematic Genetics and Integrated Multi-Omics: Beyond Static Genomics Toward Predictive Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Discovery and cultivation of prokaryotic taxa in the age of metagenomics and artificial intelligence.The ISME journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationHow can we identify causal genetic mechanisms governing bacterial traits? Initial efforts entrusting machine learning models to handle the task of predicting phenotype from genotype yield high accuracy scores. However, attempts to extract meaningful interpretations from the predictive models are found to be corrupted by falsely identified 'causal' features. Relying solely on pattern recognition and correlations is unreliable, significantly so in bacterial genomics settings where high-dimensionality and spurious associations are the norm. Though it is not yet clear whether we can overcome this hurdle, significant efforts are being made towards discovering potential high-risk bacterial genetic variants. In view of this, we set up open problems surrounding phenotype prediction from bacterial whole-genome datasets and extending those approaches to learning causal effects, and discuss challenges that impact the reliability of a machine's decision-making when faced with datasets of this nature.
resultsWe identify major sources of non-injectivity in the formulation of the genotype-to-phenotype mapping function-linkage-disequilibrium, limited sampling, information loss in representations, unmeasured confounders and observational noise-and analyse their implications for machine learning applications. Using a collection of 4,140 Staphylococcus aureus isolates, we illustrate challenges surrounding the defined open problems. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Raw sequencing data are available from the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under project accessions ERP001012, PRJEB3174, PRJEB2655, PRJEB2756, and PRJEB2944. Assemblies and annotations were generated with the Sanger bacterial pipeline (https://github.com/sanger-pathogens/vr-codebase) and unitigs extracted using DBGWAS (https://gitlab.com/leoisl/dbgwas).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.