ArticleResuscitation2025
Machine learning to identify hypoxic-ischemic brain injury on early head CT after pediatric cardiac arrest.
Article in Resuscitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wolf Creek XVIII Part 8: Wolf Creek Innovator in Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Science Award.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo train deep learning models to detect hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI) on early CT scans after pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and determine if models could identify HIBI that was not visually appreciable to a radiologist.
methodsRetrospective study of children who had a CT scan within 24 h of OHCA compared to age-matched controls. We designed models to detect HIBI by discriminating CT images from OHCA cases and controls, and predict death and unfavorable outcome (PCPC 4-6 at hospital discharge) among cases. Model performance was measured by AUC. We trained a second model to distinguish OHCA cases with radiologist-identified HIBI from controls without OHCA and tested the model on OHCA cases without radiologist-identified HIBI. We compared outcomes between OHCA cases with and without model-categorized HIBI.
resultsWe analyzed 117 OHCA cases (age 3.1 [0.7-12.2] years); 43 % died and 58 % had unfavorable outcome. Median time from arrest to CT was 2.1 [1.0,7.2] hours. Deep learning models discriminated OHCA cases from controls with a mean AUC of 0.87 ± 0.05. Among OHCA cases, mean AUCs for predicting death and unfavorable outcome were 0.79 ± 0.06 and 0.69 ± 0.06, respectively. Mean AUC was 0.98 ± 0.01 for discriminating between 44 OHCA cases with radiologist-identified HIBI and controls. Among 73 OHCA cases without radiologist-identified HIBI, the model identified 36 % as having presumed HIBI; 31 % of whom died compared to 17 % of cases without HIBI identified radiologically and via the model (p = 0.174).
conclusionDeep learning models can identify HIBI on early CT images after pediatric OHCA and detect some presumed HIBI visually not identified by a radiologist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.