ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025
Assessment of real-world disease severity in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis in the United States.
Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) disease severity is not typically reported in clinical practice. Objectives: To assess real-world EoE disease severity (assessed by physicians and using an adapted Index of Severity for EoE (I-SEE)), physician/patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and treatment patterns among adolescents and adults with EoE in the USA. Design: A noninterventional, retrospective, physician-reported medical chart review. Methods: Gastroenterologists and allergists/immunologists from a US nationwide panel completed a chart review of medical records (December 2021-January 2022) of patients aged ⩾11 years with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of EoE. Baseline data were collected ⩾6 months before diagnosis of EoE (index date), and study outcomes were collected ⩾6 months after the index date. The study outcomes assessed the EoE diagnostic process, disease severity, treatment patterns, and EoE-related HCRU. All data were stratified by physician-assessed EoE disease severity (mild, moderate, or severe (clinical severity and markers of severity)); index date data were also mapped to an adapted I-SEE scoring system post hoc. Results: Overall, 74 adolescents (11-17 years old) and 325 adults with EoE (⩾18 years old) were included; patient demographics were generally similar across severity levels. The presence of some symptoms (e.g., food impaction), allergic comorbidities (e.g., allergic rhinitis and food allergy (adults only)), duration between first symptom and index date, and the number of treatment lines received by patients increased with increasing physician-assessed EoE disease severity. However, fewer than 10% of adolescents and adults with EoE were assessed as having severe disease, and physician-assessed EoE disease severity was generally higher than the adapted I-SEE-assessed severity. Conclusion: Real-world US data indicated that most patients with EoE had mild or moderate EoE disease severity. The duration between first symptom and index date and the number of treatment lines received by patients with EoE increased with worsening EoE disease severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.