ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Structural Development of Speech Networks in Young Children: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain Microstructure and Obesity Risk in Early Childhood: Insights from Restriction Spectrum Imaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The White Matter Connectome Supporting Speech and Language in the Human.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate speech in the developing brain, 94 children aged 4 to 7 years old were scanned using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging. To increase sample size and performance variability, we included children with ADHD from a larger ongoing study (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.