ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
The mediating role of caffeine and biological age in the association between dietary index for gut microbiota and osteoporosis.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A barrier-centered perspective on the gut-barrier-bone axis: a review of the core role of the intestinal barrier and related probiotics with nanocoatings.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota and Osteoporosis Risk in Chinese Postmenopausal Women: A Case-Control Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota (DI-GM) is a novel metric developed to evaluate the diversity of intestinal microbiota. However, its relationship with osteoporosis remains uncertain. Methods: This study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted between 2007 and 2018. The DI-GM score was derived from two 24-h dietary recall interviews, while bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (QDR 4500A). Osteopenia and osteoporosis were diagnosed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) were calculated through direct standardization to the 2,000 U. S. standard population. Additionally, the study employed multivariate logistic regression, restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis, mediation analysis, and subgroup analysis to explore the data comprehensively. Results: Weighted logistic regression analysis revealed that higher DI-GM scores were significantly negatively associated with the risk of osteoporosis. Compared to the Q1 group, the Q4 group exhibited a significantly reduced risk of osteoporosis (OR = 0.781, 95% CI: 0.693-0.869). RCS curve analysis identified a nonlinear relationship between DI-GM and osteoporosis, with a critical inflection point at 3.9. Mediation analysis demonstrated that Phenotypic Age (PA), Klemera-Doubal Method (KDM) and caffeine mediated 4.73, 4.55, and 20.33% of the association between DI-GM and osteoporosis, respectively. Furthermore, age-standardized incidence rate analysis showed that the ASIR of osteoporosis was highest among women aged 60-79 years (65.09%). The ASIR for Non-Hispanic Black individuals was significantly lower compared to other racial groups. Conclusion: Higher DI-GM scores were associated with a reduced risk of developing osteoporosis, with biological age and caffeine serving as mediators in this relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.