ArticleACS omega2025
Spatial Distribution and Clustering of Glycosaminoglycans in Electrospun Gelatin-Based Scaffolds.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrospun Integrated Janus Nanofibers for Asynchronous Delivery of Finasteride and Tibetan Medicine.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Core-Sheath Nanofibers From a Modified Coaxial Electrospinning for Transdermal Delivery of Finasteride.ChemistryOpen · 2026Article
- A Modified Triaxial Electrospinning for a High Drug Encapsulation Efficiency of Curcumin in Ethylcellulose.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The extracellular matrix (ECM) is comprised of components like collagen, elastin, and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Electrospun fibrous scaffolds are designed to replicate the form and composition of the native ECM, often requiring blending of various ECM component mimics to enhance cellular responses. However, the spatial distribution of blended components within these fibers remains unclear. This study investigates the spatial distribution of chondroitin sulfate-C (CSC) in electrospun gelatin-based scaffolds. scanning electron microscopy (SEM), attenuated reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Time-of-flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) were applied for surface and subsurface chemical characterization of the fibrous scaffolds. SEM confirmed a fibrous morphology, while ATR-FTIR and XPS analyses indicated the presence of CSC through the identification of sulfate groups. ToF-SIMS imaging, alongside K-means clustering and Ripley's K function, revealed a nonuniform CSC distribution with higher concentrations at the top layer of the scaffold. This study demonstrates that CSC presentation at the fiber surface varies with depth and differs from bulk incorporation while reveals nanoscale clustering and spatial heterogeneity at both the surface and subsurface of electrospun gelatin fibers. These findings define an underexplored design consideration with potential to influence cell-scaffold interactions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.