Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584813›Full record

ArticleJCEM case reports2025

High-dose Hook Effect in a Case of Giant Prolactinoma Confounded by Acute Kidney Injury.

Anna Lam, Connie Prosser, Constance L Chik

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JCEM case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna LamDivision of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3667-5205
Connie ProsserDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada.
Constance L ChikDivision of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9609-0896

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 21-year-old man admitted to the hospital for acute kidney injury developed blindness 5 days after admission. Workup included magnetic resonance imaging, which was terminated prematurely due to a ball bearing/air gun pellet in his neck causing pain. His incomplete scan revealed a large sellar mass causing significant compression of the optic chiasm. Hormone testing showed low levels of IGF-1 and testosterone. A mildly elevated prolactin (PRL) level was attributed to stalk effect and decreased kidney function. For treatment, the patient underwent transsphenoidal tumor resection. Unexpectedly, pituitary immunohistochemistry revealed a prolactinoma. Further inquiry corroborated a history of headache, hypogonadal symptoms, and gynecomastia. He was started on a dopamine agonist with improvement in his vision and hormone levels; however, PRL was further increased. In retrospect, the mildly elevated PRL on initial testing was caused by the high-dose hook effect whereby excessively high PRL levels result in erroneously low measurements by immunoassays. Thus, in patients presenting with large sellar masses and normal/mildly elevated PRL, the sample should be diluted to exclude high-dose hook effect and ensure an accurate level. In addition, questioning of metallic fragments in plain language may help prevent magnetic resonance imaging injury.

Indexed as

giant prolactinomahook effectprolactin

Identifiers

PMID40584813
PMCPMC12206092

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.