Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585051›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Reflexive case studies on conducting technology implementation research in long-term care homes.

Lillian Hung, Joey Oi Yee Wong, Haniya Bharucha, Lily Haopu Ren, Charlene Chu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lillian HungSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7916-2939
Joey Oi Yee WongSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2181-6255
Haniya BharuchaLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2166-1134
Lily Haopu RenSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0969-0980
Charlene ChuLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0333-7210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Technological advancements offer the potential to address healthcare challenges, such as improving residents' quality of life in long-term care homes (LTCHs). However, there is often a mismatch between developed technologies and the actual needs of residents and staff, leading to poor adoption. Researchers conducting research on developing and implementing technologies in LTCHs face unique challenges. Understanding these challenges is crucial for enhancing technology adoption and sustainability in LTCHs. Methods: This qualitative reflection study is about the experiences of two technology implementation projects in British Columbia and Ontario, Canada. Researchers from the Telepresence Robot and MouvMat projects participated in four reflection sessions. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we identified themes and gained valuable insight into the experiences, lessons learned, and recommendations. Results: Both projects faced challenges in recruitment, accommodating individual residents' needs and routines, staff shortages and turnover, and logistics barriers due to infrastructural limitations and changing guidelines. The Telepresence Robot and the MouvMat teams implemented a range of adaptive strategies. These included frequent check-ins with families, creating appropriate training materials, co-developing tailored solutions, flexible recruitment approaches, staff engagement tactics, and personalized support. Conclusion: The lessons learned highlighted the need for adaptive strategies in conducting research in LTCHs. The study calls for structural support and partnerships between academics and practice locally, nationally, and internationally, as well as efforts to combat ageism in technology use. Researchers need support for knowledge translation and sharing findings to highlight the value of staff participation and showcase research benefits.

Indexed as

digital healthgerontechnologyGerontologyimplementationinnovative solutionsinterdisciplinary collaborationlearning health systemsenior care

Identifiers

PMID40585051
PMCPMC12205190

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.