Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585187›Full record

ReviewThe journal of liquid biopsy2025

Liquid biopsy as a potential tool for diagnosis and clinical monitoring of cutaneous and uveal melanoma.

Letícia Silva Ferraz, Alana Silveira Oliveira Souza, Tiago Rodrigues, Mauro Jorge Cabral-Castro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Letícia Silva FerrazCenter for Natural and Human Sciences (CCNH), Federal University of ABC (UFABC), Santo André, SP, Brazil.
Alana Silveira Oliveira SouzaInstitute of Biomedical Sciences (ICB), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Tiago RodriguesCenter for Natural and Human Sciences (CCNH), Federal University of ABC (UFABC), Santo André, SP, Brazil.
Mauro Jorge Cabral-CastroDepartment of Pathology, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma is the most aggressive type of skin cancer, characterized by high metastatic potential and high mortality rates. Currently, diagnosis and mutational status assessment involves the excisional tissue biopsy followed by anatomopathological and immunohistochemical analyses. However, this technique is invasive and does not assess the molecular heterogeneity of the tumor. Also, it cannot be applied for the continuous monitoring of the disease. Gathering this information is essential for tumor staging, as well as for helping to select the most appropriate therapeutic approach for the patient. To overcome these limitations, liquid biopsy has arisen as an innovative diagnostic tool, which is a molecular determination technique for assessing tumor heterogeneity. Liquid biopsy is defined as the sampling of circulating biomarkers from tumor cells in various biological matrices, including circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor RNA, extracellular vesicles (EVs), and proteins. In this review, we will discuss the potential of liquid biopsy for the clinical assessment of cutaneous and uveal melanoma, evaluating advantages and some parameters, such as efficiency and specificity. To this end, a bibliographical survey was carried out in the main search databases for scientific articles in the health area, published between March 2019 and October 2024, using the keywords "melanoma", "biomarker", and "liquid biopsy", and 56 articles were found. All these articles highlight the potential of liquid biopsy for personalized treatment of melanoma, early screening, diagnosis and prognosis, detection of relapses, monitoring of metastases, and selection of appropriated treatments. However, additional randomized controlled clinical trials comparing the use of liquid biopsy with the diagnostic gold standard are still needed to validate and evaluate the benefits of its use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Cutaneous melanomaLiquid biopsyTumor biomarkersUveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID40585187
PMCPMC12205811

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.