Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585262›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Estimating a change-point of baseline age in the longitudinal trajectories of biomarkers: application to an imaging study of preclinical Alzheimer disease.

Chengjie Xiong, Folasade Agboola, Jingqin Luo

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chengjie XiongDivision of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Folasade AgboolaDivision of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jingqin LuoDivision of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN MORRIS · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
Project 4 (Genetic modifiers for APOE-associated Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis)U19AG069701 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI DAVID M. HOLTZMAN · 2021 to 2026
$42.0M
Project: Predicting PhenoconversionU19AG071754 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Bradley F Boeve, Yo-El S Ju · 2021 to 2026
$41.2M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066444 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Susan Lynn Stark · 2020 to 2026
$28.7M
Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Racial Disparity in Molecular Biomarkers of Alzheimer DiseaseR01AG067505 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI XIONG, CHENGJIE · 2020 to 2024
$14.7M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066444NIA NIH HHS R01 AG067505NIA NIH HHS U19 AG069701NIA NIH HHS U19 AG071754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Biomarkers are routinely measured from human biospecimens and imaging scans in Alzheimer disease (AD) research. Age is a well-known risk factor for AD. Detecting the age at which the longitudinal change in biomarkers starts to accelerate, i.e., a change-point in age, is important to design preventive interventions. Methods: We analyzed longitudinal biomarker data by a random intercept and random slope model where the slope (longitudinal rate of change) was modeled as a piecewise linear and continuous function of baseline age. We proposed to estimate the intersection of the two linear functions, i.e., the change-point in age by multiple methods: maximum (profile) likelihood, minimum squared pseudo bias, minimum variance, minimum mean square error (MSE), and a two-stage method. We simulated large numbers of data sets to evaluate the performance of these estimators and implemented them to analyze the longitudinal white matter hypointensity from brain magnetic resonance imaging scans in an AD cohort study of 616 participants to estimate the age when the longitudinal rate of change starts to accelerate. Results: Our simulations indicated that performance was universally poor for all point estimators and CI estimates when the true change-point was near the boundary or when sample size was small (N=100). Yet, the proposed change-point estimators became approximately unbiased and showed relatively small MSE when sample size increased (N>200) and the true change-point was away from boundary. The 95% CIs from these methods also provided good nominal coverage with large sample sizes if the change-point was away from boundary. When applied to the AD biomarker study, we found that almost all methods yielded similar estimates to the change-point from 59.19 years to 65.78 years, but the profile likelihood approach led to a much later estimate. Conclusions: Our proposed estimators for the change-point performed reasonably well, especially when it is away from the boundary and the sample sizes are large. Our methods revealed a largely consistent age when the longitudinal change in white matter hypointensity started to accelerate. Further research is needed to tackle more complex challenges, i.e., multiple change-points that may depend on other AD risk factors.

Indexed as

Alzheimer diseasebiomarkerchange-pointpoint and confidence interval estimators

Identifiers

PMID40585262
PMCPMC12204498

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.