ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2025
The clinical utility and prognostic value of next-generation sequencing for measurable residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding the archipelago: single-cell biomarkers rechart the molecular geography of acute myeloid leukemia.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Construction and validation of a nomogram model for predicting 60-day mortality in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers a method for measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment by detecting leukemia-associated genetic mutations. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical implications and prognostic value of NGS-based MRD assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Design: Sixty-nine adult AML patients were included for NGS (targeted sequencing of AML-related 47 genes), of which 56 patients at initial diagnosis, 69 patients in the first day of consolidation therapy (C1D1), and 51 patients during 2-year MRD monitoring (detection following the C1D1) were enrolled. Methods: Mutation data were categorized into gene mutations, somatic mutations and somatic mutations excluding clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) for analysis. The study also integrated multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and NGS data at C1D1 to evaluate the prognostic significance of combining the two MRD techniques. Results: Mutation detection rates were 98.21%, 69.57%, and 84.31% for AML patients at initial diagnosis, C1D1 stage, and MRD monitoring, respectively, identified by targeted sequencing. During MRD monitoring, the Conclusion: The combined assessment of MFC-MRD and NGS-MRD status provides a refined prognostic stratification, with the absence of somatic mutations and MFC-MRD negativity correlating with improved progression-free survival, which is expected to improve clinical prognostic assessment of AML patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.