ReviewCureus2025
Exploring the Association Between Myocardial Infarction and Cognitive Decline: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic and therapeutic innovations in myocardial infarction: a focus on mitochondrial dysfunction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The association between cognitive impairment (CI) and myocardial infarction (MI) has been highlighted in recent years. Several studies have reported an increased incidence of cognitive decline (CD) following MI, emphasizing the need for early identification and intervention in such patients. Previous research findings have been inconsistent due to the presence of various unaccounted factors potentially contributing to CD and disparities in the methods utilized to assess cognition such as the Mini-Mental State Examination, Mini-Cog and self-evaluation questionnaires. This emphasizes the potential for a more standardized tool of assessment to investigate the onset of CD amongst MI patients in a reliable manner. This literature review delineates the correlation between MI and CI, exploring the pathogenesis, risk factors, management and preventive strategies. Cerebral hypoperfusion, underlying atherosclerosis and neuroinflammation are crucial in the development of CD after MI. Hence, it is important to consider the 'heart-brain axis' for targeted therapy of CD in MI patients. Old age is a common risk factor for CD and MI. However, the impact of variables including gender and comorbidities is underreported, which can potentially alter the relationship between cognitive outcomes and MI. The implementation of multidisciplinary-oriented cardiac rehabilitation programs and a universal screening tool to follow up on patients with established CI post-MI has shown favorable outcomes and has reduced the risk of adverse health consequences. Optimizing medical management and regular monitoring of serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and hemoglobin levels are essential in preventing CD after MI. Psychological evaluation and counselling also help attenuate CD. Additionally, preventive strategies addressing modifiable risk factors and implementing anti-inflammatory diets have proven beneficial. Ongoing research is focused on the study of novel interventions targeting the neuroinflammatory process. Recently a new member of the C-reactive protein family, pentraxin 3, has been identified as a specific vascular inflammatory biomarker produced by cells in atherosclerotic lesions that can potentially aid in recognizing CD. It is imperative to establish uniform guidelines to recognize and manage CI among patients following MI to improve quality of life among the elderly population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.